The International Atomic Energy Agency revealed in late November that Iran is stockpiling vast amounts of enriched uranium which is needed for for weapons-grade material and which can be made into a nuclear weapon.
The agency says that, as of this month, Tehran had amassed 630kg of low enriched uranium hexafluoride, up from 480kg in late August. Analysts say Iran is enriching uranium at such a pace that, by early next year, it could reach break-out capacity – one step away from producing enough fissile material for a crude nuclear bomb.
“They are moving forward, they are not making diplomatic overtures, they are accumulating low enriched uranium,” said Cliff Kupchan, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, a risk consultancy in Washington. “These guys are committed to their nuclear programme: if we didn’t know that, they just told us again.”
Iran will remain defiant to world opinion as long as they perceive that the U.S., as the world’s strongest actor, is thoroughly occupied in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are hellbent on being a regional power and Western agitator in the Middle-East as evident from the Israeli/Lebanon conflict in 2006, which Iran heavily influenced and bankrolled.
Since then, the Iranian Islamic Republic offers real military training in live-fire and rocket firing exercises to Hizbullah fighters. Iran is preparing in advance if another regional flare up should happen, but this time with the possibility of one involving them, Israel will be thoroughly occupied in its own front yard. With the U.S. bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran is practically free to conduct business as it sees fit and is starting to show a few more cards.
While many people in America thought well of Obama’s overtures to our enemies, nation’s don’t generally react with good intentions to such niceties. A country like Iran, views it as an opportunity to exploit a situation and push the very limits up until general war.
Ahead of Wednesday’s report, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, the Iranian president, signalled that his country would press ahead with its nuclear program.
In a speech broadcast on TV, he said the US and its major allies wanted to deprive Iran of “honor and independence” by pressuring the country into halting its uranium enrichment work.
“Now the great powers are disappointed, as they have not the least bit of hope to break the Iranian people down,” he said. “If great powers seek to take over Iran’s rights, Iranian people will slap them so hard that they won’t find their way back home.”
The Obama administration will have to decide quickly on what type of position and tone he plans to take because Iran poses a major foreign policy issue for President Obama and possibly a disastrous one for his Presidency. Tehran has ignored numerous sanctions resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council demanding that it halt its nuclear ambitions and come to to terms with other world powers.
As a result of the, so far, failed soft-power policies, many experts are predicting that Iran could become nuclear with the capacity for a bomb within two years. If this would occur, besides it giving Tehran the boost it needs to becoming the regional superpower, an arms race in the volatile Middle-East will certainly follow. How long would it be before groups like Hizbullah and Hamas got their hands on a crude nuclear device, i.e, a dirty bomb? Cities like Haifa and Tel Aviv in Israel would be wonderful target of opportunities.
That is precisely why Israel will prevent that from ever happening. They are reportedly on go and all options are open for direct intervention.
“We are ready to do whatever is demanded of us” in order to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, IAF commander Maj. -Gen. Ido Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel in an interview published Tuesday.
A strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities “is a political decision,” the IAF commander said, “but if I understand it correctly, all options are on the table… The Air Force is a very robust and flexible force. We are ready to do whatever is demanded of us.
If this option by Israel were to be carried out, a state of war would exist between Israel and Iran. The chances of the Gaza Strip lighting up would be certain along with reactions from Hizbullah in Lebanon, and a real possibility of Syria, Iran’s only real ally, and Israel clashing and resuming their chilled war. With the help of Iran, Hizbullah has been expanding on a vast network of bunkers in Southern Lebanon south of the Jezzine river, and is believed to be equipped with a new arsenal of long-range weapons to include some capable of challenging Israel’s air supremacy. The same type of high-tech weaponry from Iran that was used against one of Israel’s main naval war ships, the SAAR 5 Corvette. All of this being done in preparation of the next regional war. Israel itself would become a landing pad for medium and long range missiles and a bloody ground war would ensue from trying to dislodge the Hizbullah fighters from their hills, caves and bunkers. The U.S. would be forced to become involved in some form or fashion, rather it wants to or not.
All scenarios are ugly. That is why one thing for certain remains crystal clear: Iran cannot, must not, develop nuclear weapons of any sort. President-elect Obama realizes this point and said that a nuclear Iran would be “unacceptable.” Israel will not sit idly by while Iran arms Hizbullah to the teeth with high-tech weaponry as a check while they pursue a weapon that could “erase them from the map.”
As much as many would hate to see holding official talks with Iran that may be the only option left before surgical bombing raids would have to be conducted. Except these discussions should not be about military or economic threats. They don’t work and have no effect. It would have to be a one way discussion with President Obama presenting an ultimatum (not the same as military threat, and do so privately to allow the Iranians to save face) giving the Iranians a small window of opportunity to cease production or else. Instead of having all options on the table, there would only be two sitting there when the Iranian senior leadership arrived.
They get those sort of messages.










8 responses so far ↓
Jeff // January 3, 2009 at 6:46 am
Excellent post Jason. Obama also said a nuclear Iran was “a game changer.” I look forward to seeing just how Obama plans to change the game. Iran is going to have the bomb unless force is used to stop them. The U.N., like with Iraq, is making itself insignificant again. Force against Iran is probably the only option at this point. Certainly Israel has a tipping point built into their plans. At some point their going to act if we don’t. And that point is fast approaching.
Jason // January 3, 2009 at 6:33 pm
Yes, I wonder if this Hamas situation will give Israel more of an initiative to act. If this thing escalates who knows what other external actors may be involved. Israel may find itself fighting Iran via Hizballah again. Not to mention, Sryia also has a dog in this hunt.
Thanks for the comment.
UNRR // January 4, 2009 at 9:35 am
This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 1/4/2009, at The Unreligious Right
American Interests // January 4, 2009 at 10:09 am
I am expecting a hard line stance from Obama as he will soon realize the folly of his stated methods prior to election and I can accept that. Israel is as I write, demonstating its intent on protecting its own. If the Iranian regime becomes threatening, that is seriously threatening, expect a powder keg situation.
Jason // January 4, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Otto, I agree. There is a difference in saying what your base wants to hear and actually doing what is right. He’ll have no choice but to engage Iran, forcefully or otherwise, over their intentions and potentially destabilizing ambitions…Israel is no doubt sending a message.
Jason // January 4, 2009 at 6:25 pm
UNRR,
Glad you found it worthy enough to share it.
Jason // January 4, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Tom thanks for the awesome input! Maybe I should have consorted you before I wrote it.
Very good points on things I went a little light on.
Tom the Redhunter // January 4, 2009 at 8:04 pm
I agree that this post is a useful, informative, and a mostly correct analysis. I too think Iran closer to getting some sort of nuclear weapon than the naysayers would have us believe.
I am less sanguine, though, on whether Israel will strike Iran before it happens.
On the one hand, the case for action would seem obvious. In his first year Obama will try diplomacy, and it will fail. Israel will have to wait for the diplomacy to fail, because Obama will insist on it. One would then think that with annihilation staring it in it’s face, Israel would act.
But this is not the Israel of 1967. An Israeli strike would require U.S. cooperation to be even minimally effective, and it’s possible Obama may refuse cooperation. Israel may still be in the grip of a weak government (Bibi not having been able to win enough votes to make himself PM) and they may buy into Obama’s smooth assurances of protection.
Striking Hamas is one thing, Iran quite another. It would create a regional conflagration unlike any war since 1973.